> Frequantly Asked Questions
How do you conduct an employee fraud investigation without disrupting daily operations?

Our investigations are planned carefully to minimize visibility and disruption. Information is gathered discreetly, and engagement with employees or departments is handled only when necessary and in a controlled manner.

We investigate matters such as expense abuse, payroll manipulation, asset diversion, misuse of authority, and other forms of financial misconduct within an organisation.

Yes. Our work focuses on evidence-backed accountability. Findings are documented clearly and supported by corroborated evidence, making them suitable for internal disciplinary processes or legal review, where required.

Beyond identifying misconduct, our analysis highlights control failures and process gaps. These insights can be used to strengthen internal controls and reduce the risk of similar issues recurring.

What types of vendor fraud do you investigate?

We investigate matters such as inflated billing, kickbacks, shell vendors, and coordinated misconduct between vendors and internal stakeholders.

Our analysis looks beyond invoices. We examine ownership links, pricing patterns, procurement deviations, and behavioral indicators that suggest coordinated activity.

Investigations are conducted discreetly and in a controlled manner. The objective is to establish facts while minimizing operational or reputational impact.

Yes. In addition to identifying misconduct, our work highlights process gaps and control weaknesses, helping organizations strengthen procurement governance.

How do you protect the identity of whistleblowers?

Confidentiality and source protection are central to our process. Information access is strictly controlled, and disclosures are limited to what is necessary for fact-finding.

Yes. Investigations are conducted independently and neutrally, without influence from internal stakeholders, to ensure credibility and fairness.

Our documentation is structured for board-level review and is suitable for audit and compliance processes.

We focus on evidence-based validation and clearly distinguish facts from interpretation, ensuring balanced and defensible outcomes.

Do you conduct independent POSH investigations?

Yes. We conduct independent investigations and also provide support to Internal Complaints Committees where required.

Our process follows statutory POSH requirements and focuses on procedural integrity, neutrality, and proper documentation.

Information is handled on a need-to-know basis, with strict controls to protect the privacy of all parties involved.

Yes. All documentation is legally structured and aligned with POSH compliance standards.

What types of data incidents do you investigate?

We investigate unauthorised access, data exfiltration, misuse of systems, and intellectual property exposure originating from internal or privileged access.

Our analysis relies on digital artefacts such as logs, access records, and usage patterns to support clear attribution.

Investigations are conducted carefully and in coordination with relevant stakeholders to minimise operational disruption.

Yes. In addition to identifying misuse, our work highlights vulnerabilities and insider risk indicators that can inform preventive measures.

How is senior-level background verification different from standard checks?

Senior roles carry greater responsibility and exposure. Our investigations go beyond basic verification to identify integrity, reputation, and conflict-related risks.

Yes. Our reporting is structured specifically for board-level and senior leadership review.

Engagements are handled with strict confidentiality, limited visibility, and controlled information access.

Yes. Our work can support both pre-hire assessments and reviews of existing senior leadership roles.

How do you ensure discretion during relationship investigations?

All investigations are conducted quietly and lawfully, with strict attention to privacy and confidentiality.

No. Our approach focuses on observation and verification without interference or provocation.

Yes. Findings are presented clearly and factually, without interpretation or judgment.

Our findings provide fact-based clarity that can support personal decision-making and, where applicable, further action.

Is pre-marital verification about mistrust?

No. It is a due-diligence exercise intended to support informed decision-making before a major life commitment.

Verification may include personal background, professional claims, past relationships, and financial or lifestyle consistency, based on the scope agreed upon.

All work is conducted discreetly, with strict confidentiality and controlled information handling.

No. Findings are factual and verified, without assumptions or subjective interpretation.

What type of evidence do you typically collect?

We focus on lifestyle, financial, and behavioural evidence that is relevant to divorce, custody, or alimony considerations, based on the scope agreed upon.

Yes. Our documentation is structured to support legal review and can be coordinated with legal strategy where required.

All investigations are carried out with strict discretion and controlled information handling to protect privacy.

No. Our role is limited to fact-finding. We provide evidence without advocacy or opinion.

Can you guarantee that an individual will be located?

No. Our work focuses on lawful intelligence gathering and verification. While we aim to establish location intelligence where possible, outcomes depend on available information and circumstances.

All activities are conducted within legal boundaries, with careful consideration of privacy and applicable laws.

Yes. We provide regular, controlled updates to keep clients informed without compromising the process.

Yes. Cases involving missing family members are handled with care, discretion, and sensitivity to emotional impact.

What types of financial fraud do you investigate?

We investigate cheating, misrepresentation, diversion of funds, and breaches of trust involving personal, family, or partnership arrangements.

Our documentation is structured to support legal review and can assist with further legal or recovery actions.

All investigations are handled with discretion, neutrality, and respect for personal circumstances.

No. Our role is limited to fact-finding. We provide evidence without advocacy or judgment.

Is parental monitoring the same as surveillance?

No. Our work is risk-focused and protective. We do not engage in intrusive or curiosity-driven surveillance.

All activities are conducted within legal boundaries, with careful consideration of privacy, consent, and child welfare.

Our approach is designed to minimise intrusion and avoid unnecessary harm, focusing on understanding risks rather than confrontation.

Concerns may include sudden behavioural changes, online exposure, external influences, or perceived safety risks, both online and offline.